THADDEUS FOR BANKINGProvidenSI for companies ↗

SECURITY & PRIVACY / FOR YOUR BANK

Customer trust.
Clear controls.

Protecting customer information starts before the first assignment. Define where data is processed, who can access it, which actions are allowed, and how your bank will verify the result.

Dedicated bank-hosted deployments are scoped separately from the standard desktop product. On-premises hosting alone does not establish regulatory compliance or guarantee that information never leaves the bank.

Get the due diligence guide
AI-generated illustration of a security specialist reviewing demo access and data-boundary information in a fictional Cedar & Stone Community Bank operations room

CUSTOMER INFORMATION / IDENTITY & CYBERSECURITY

Know your customer.
Protect their information.

A Customer Identification Program (CIP) review asks who the customer is. A cybersecurity review asks how their information is accessed, handled, and protected. Bring both into a clear packet for the right bank reviewers.

ILLUSTRATIVE REVIEW WORKFLOW

One intake. Two review tracks.
Decisions stay with your bank.

SYNTHETIC DATA ONLY
  1. 01
    Scope the intakeApproved policy, sources, and access
  2. 02
    Review the evidenceIdentity and information safeguards
  3. 03
    Surface exceptionsSources, gaps, and a named owner
  4. 04
    Bank staff decideResolve, record, and follow up

IDENTITY EVIDENCE

CIP review

  • Required identifying informationCheck the applicable name, address, identification number, and date of birth for an individual against the bank’s written program.
  • Verification methods & resultsOrganize supplied documentary or non-documentary evidence, source references, and discrepancies for staff validation.
  • Notice & recordsIdentify evidence of customer notice and the records required by the bank’s CIP, including unresolved verification questions.
EXAMPLE EXCEPTION

Identity-verification result not supplied.

Route to the bank’s CIP reviewer. Do not infer that a document proves identity.

CUSTOMER-INFORMATION PROTECTION

Cybersecurity review

  • Who can access the file?Review supplied evidence of authorized roles, least-privilege access, authentication, and the bank’s layered-security requirements.
  • Where does information travel?Compare documented collection, transfer, storage, and third-party access with the bank’s approved data-handling requirements.
  • What needs escalation?Flag missing control evidence, unexpected sharing, or suspicious file-handling indicators. Technical validation stays with security staff.
EXAMPLE EXCEPTION

Document-sharing permissions not evidenced.

Route to the security owner. Missing evidence is not proof of a breach.
A review packet, not an automatic approval.

Source references, open questions, and proposed follow-up go to the bank’s designated compliance and security owners.

BANK REVIEW REQUIRED
Illustrative read-only workflow, not a product screenshot or live risk assessment. No customer information is collected, verified, or transmitted by this illustration.

LESS FILE ASSEMBLY. MORE TIME FOR REVIEW.

Give the reviewer a clearer starting point.

Where included in the agreed deployment, use Thaddeus to assemble a draft checklist from approved sources, link findings to evidence, and organize follow-up. Keep customer identifiers out of broadly shared summaries and preserve the original records.

A useful pilot assignment

“Using this synthetic onboarding packet and approved bank procedures, prepare separate CIP and customer-information-security checklists. Cite the evidence for each item, mark anything not supplied, and propose a reviewer for each open question. Do not contact the customer, verify identity independently, open an account, or change a bank record.”
Review the bank’s information safeguards
See a fictional review packet

EXAMPLE CASE / CIP-DEMO-01

Synthetic scenario: the packet includes placeholder intake fields, but no verification outcome or evidence of the document-sharing controls. No real name, account number, or identification document is used.

CIP evidence
Verification outcome not supplied. The bank’s reviewer checks the applicable method, result, and any discrepancy resolution.
Customer-information risk
Access evidence not supplied. The security owner confirms permissions and approved sharing before real information is used.
Draft output
A source index, two open questions, and proposed review owners. No risk score or compliance status is assigned.

Disposition: bank review required. No account opened, credit decision made, records changed, or regulatory report filed.

Separate responsibilities, one coordinated review. CIP identity verification and cybersecurity controls serve different purposes. This illustration is not a complete CIP, a security assessment, or a compliance certification. The bank determines applicable rules, exceptions, verification timing, retention, and account handling under its written program. Customer due diligence, beneficial ownership, sanctions screening, and suspicious-activity obligations are separately scoped; they are not resolved by this diagram.

Reference points: FFIEC BSA/AML Manual: Customer Identification Program and OCC Bulletin 2021-36: authentication and access guidance (August 11, 2021). The CIP reference describes identifying information, risk-based verification, and records; the access guidance emphasizes risk assessment and layered safeguards. Use the requirements and guidance applicable to your institution.

Explore the customer-onboarding workflow

AGREE ON THE REQUIREMENTS. ASK FOR THE EVIDENCE.

Six priorities for
your bank’s evaluation.

Start vendor due diligence with the proposed service, the information it can access, and the actions it can take. Match the evidence request to that scope. These are requirements to establish, not claims that every configuration already meets them.

01 / CUSTOMER-DATA BOUNDARY

Know every information path.

Map inference, approved documents, retrieval indexes, prompts, answers, logs, backups, updates, and support exports. Test the agreed network restrictions and identify any external service dependencies.

02 / ACCESS & AUTHORITY

Test the rules, not just the prompt.

Define staff roles, source permissions, administration, and support access. Permission to read a document is not permission to email it, upload it, or share it externally. Test excluded information and prohibited actions.

03 / EVIDENCE & REVIEW

Make an answer inspectable.

Check source passages, dates, conflicts, unsupported claims, and missing information. Agree on review criteria and keep consequential decisions with accountable bank personnel.

04 / RECORDS & RETENTION

Keep the right record.

Agree which activity is recorded, who may inspect it, how long it is retained, and how deletion and exports work. Confirm data-use restrictions in the applicable contract.

05 / CHANGE & SUPPORT

Control changes to the environment.

Assign responsibility for patches, model and software updates, evaluation after changes, rollback, and temporary support access. Establish how your bank approves each release.

06 / RECOVERY & CONTINUITY

Plan for an interrupted day.

Define incident response, backup and restore testing, recovery objectives, manual alternatives, and an exit path. Test capacity on the hardware proposed for your bank.

Begin with a read-only pilot and approved or synthetic inputs. Live customer data requires the bank’s security and risk review and expressly agreed written safeguards. Request the available assurance documentation and assess its actual scope; no certification or regulator approval is implied here.

Define your bank-hosted deployment

BANKING RESOURCE / SECURITY & DATA GUIDE

Bank AI Due Diligence & Data Boundaries

Evaluate the proposed service rather than a reassuring label. Trace information paths, examine vendor evidence, and distinguish customer identification from cybersecurity review.

  • Map processing, outputs, logs, backups, and support access.
  • Separate CIP evidence from cybersecurity control review.
  • Document findings, evidence gaps, owners, and decisions.

Send it to my inbox.

Request this resource by email from ProvidenSI. Please don’t enter customer information.

Local preview only. Kit signup and email delivery are not connected. The complete guide is drafted and awaiting publication. Nothing is sent or saved.

THADDEUS WORKFLOW CAPABILITIES

Define the assignment.
Review the result.

These general Thaddeus capabilities support a supervised workflow. Confirm availability, access, and processing requirements in the dedicated bank deployment scope.

Scope permissions & connected accounts.

Supported connections bring business tools into the assignment with the account access and authorizations they require.

  • Connect only the accounts and resources the task needs.
  • Review permitted reads, changes, sends, and publication before authorizing the work.
Explore connected actions

Agree on a plan. Review delivery.

Plans, checkpoints, and delivery review give the assignment a defined scope and a result to compare with it.

  • Approve the plan revision, inputs, and review criteria.
  • Compare completed work, blockers, and open questions with that plan.
Explore plans & review

Use a dedicated browser with handoff.

A separate, persistent browser profile gives web work its own workspace, with user handoff so you can inspect or take over.

  • Use the handoff to examine the page and continue the task yourself when needed.
  • Treat visited websites as external services, not as local project storage.
Explore the working browser

Keep local project records.

Keep core project state and generated files locally, with persistent plans, checkpoints, research, and results to support continuity.

  • Carry relevant decisions into the next assignment rather than rebuilding the brief.
  • Inspect saved records and files before reusing or sharing them.
Explore project continuity

Supervise work. Stop when needed.

Relay lets a paired phone inspect desktop progress, answer questions, approve actions, and stop work.

  • Confirm pairing, connectivity, and a running desktop session before relying on remote supervision.
  • Check completed actions separately. Stopping work does not undo actions already taken.
Explore remote supervision

Review outputs before use.

Source evidence, previews, delivery checks, and revisions give you material to inspect. They are not proof that an output is correct or ready to release.

  • Check facts, calculations, rights, and intended recipients.
  • Inspect generated files and test software before sharing or deploying it.
Explore deliverables & revisions

Authorization has a scope. Your authorization can cover actions within an agreed scope; not every individual step is necessarily prompted again. Review the active permissions, allowed actions, and approval boundaries before delegating work.

Controls depend on the platform, release, accounts, permissions, and services involved. A plan supports scope discipline and verification; it does not eliminate every error, biased interpretation, or attack. Evaluate the workflow you intend to use.

Standard desktop / on your computer

Local project records.

The product page describes local storage of core project state and generated files. This helps define where that project material is kept.

Storage location
When a service is needed

Possible external processing.

Requested AI, web, media, telephony, and connected-app operations may transmit relevant information to external services.

Processing & disclosure

Local-first does not mean entirely local. The standard desktop product can use external services for requested operations. A dedicated bank-hosted deployment has a separately agreed scope; confirm processing, network access, retention, and available features rather than transferring assumptions from one offering to the other.

Questions worth asking

Make the boundaries
part of the decision.

01

What can the workflow access and do?

Review connected accounts, requested permissions, and consequential actions. Product permission controls support supervision, but do not replace your organization’s access decisions and responsibilities.

02

What may a service retain or use?

Retention and permitted uses vary by provider, service, operation, and applicable agreement. The current privacy policy does not make a universal zero-retention or no-service-improvement promise for every provider. Review the applicable policy and agreement for the operation you intend to use.

03

Is the information suitable for this service?

Regulated or highly sensitive data needs expressly agreed written safeguards before submission. Do not infer banking, healthcare, residency, or compliance suitability from a local-storage description.

04

Which agreement covers the intended deployment?

The standard desktop public beta is not an enterprise service-level agreement. A dedicated bank-hosted solution requires its own agreed scope for data handling, updates, support, recovery, and service commitments. Do not infer those terms from a desktop subscription.

A PRACTICAL FIRST EVALUATION

Test the workflow.
Keep the stakes low.

Begin with synthetic records and test accounts, not real customer information or sensitive business documents. Choose one bounded assignment and have a person supervise it before considering broader use.

Use this checklist as a discussion aid during your trial. Checking a box does not change product permissions or record an approval in Thaddeus.

Evaluation checklist

Explore the Thaddeus blog

A SERIOUS CONVERSATION ABOUT YOUR REQUIREMENTS

Bring your standards.
Define the fit.

Your bank’s customer information, internal policies, and operational records deserve a review of the actual information path and commitments.

Data & access

Identify the information involved, connected accounts, allowed actions, and people responsible for review. Confirm external processing, retention, deletion, and access requirements for each service.

Agreements & evidence

Request the assurance documentation your organization needs. Establish applicable data-processing agreements, bank security requirements, deployment scope, and service commitments before using customer or regulated data.

Output & disclosure

Eligible exports carry no added Thaddeus watermark, so your work can use your branding. That does not remove metadata, service logs, license conditions, or legally required disclosure, and it does not guarantee anonymity.

Read the source

Standard desktop agreements.

These published agreements describe the current desktop service. They do not replace the separately negotiated data handling, deployment, support, and service commitments for a dedicated bank-hosted solution.

Have specific requirements?

Start with the questions that matter.

Describe your requirements without submitting sensitive data. Any custom safeguards, deployment option, or contractual commitment must be confirmed separately.

Discuss your requirements